Fahrenheit
9/11 (2004)
Rated R
Starring: Michael Moore, George W. Bush,
and Dick Cheney
Rating:

out
of

|
Michael
Moore stirred up plenty of controversy with Bowling
for Columbine in 2002. Critics chided the director for
playing fast and loose with the facts and being creative with the
editing of certain interviews and situations.
Others lauded the film's take on the question of why guns are such a popular
tool of violence in the United States.
Love him or hate him, one cannot ignore Michael Moore. It's been even
harder to ignore this movie. In one weekend, it became the highest grossing
documentary of all-time. That says a lot for the fact that there is an
audience for this type of film -- an anti-Bush tirade in an election year
-- but does it mean it's any good? Well, it's definitely an effective
damnation of the Bush administration and their reasons for going to war
in Iraq. However, for me, it was much better as a reminder that those
that defend our freedom are usually the ones who benefit the least from
what the country has to offer.
Fahrenheit
9/11 opens with
a revisiting of the 2000 election and the somewhat convoluted circumstances
by which George W. Bush became the 42nd
President of the United States. We then follow Bush through the relatively
uneventful time between January 20, 2001 to September 11, 2001 and the
attack on the U.S. by terrorists. Moore then concentrates on Bush's initial
reaction to the attack -- spending time reading "My Pet Goat" to
a classroom full of schoolchildren for several minutes before doing anything
-- before beginning to tie Bush to Saudi Arabian financial interests as
well as making connections between the Bush and Bin Laden families. Finally,
we get to the meat of the film: the reasoning behind the invasion of Iraq
in the name of the "war on terror."
While
some critics might want to take on Moore's allegations one-by-one and
dispute or defend them, I was much more interested in the film's look
at what Americans don't normally see on the news during reports of the
events in Iraq. By allowing audiences to see -- for what I can only assume
is the first time for most viewers -- the bloodshed, pain and death associated
with the conflict in Iraq as felt by both the civilians and the soldiers,
the debate over the rest of the film's content is pointless. Moore, however,
sharpens his focus by illustrating that in poor areas of the United States,
like his hometown of Flint, Michigan, joining the armed forces is usually
the only ticket out of poverty. As corporations salivate over the amount
of
money they're going to make in the rebuilt Iraq, the poor youth of the
nation will end up risking their lives for pathetically low wages so someone
else can get rich.
While not as entertaining as Bowling
for Columbine, Fahrenheit 9/11 is
worth seeing if only for the information it provides about what we're
not seeing from the news media regarding the war in Iraq. If you're worried
that Moore doesn't play honest, just remember that, in politics, no one
is honest. You have to make up your own mind. You can't have an opinion
if you don't see the movie. Trivia: After
its official showing at the 2004 Cannes Film Festival the movie was
given what has been called "the longest standing ovation in the
history of the festival". Although the exact length of the applause
is a matter of debate, journalists at the screening have reported
it being in the area of 15 to 25 minutes. (Source: The
Internet Movie Database) |