Van
Helsing (2004)
Rated PG13
Starring: Hugh Jackman, Kate Beckinsale,
and Richard Roxburgh
Rating:

out
of

|
The benchmark for how not to incorporate computer graphics and special
effects into your script has arrived in the form of Van Helsing, a loud
and senseless revamp of the Universal horror monsters of the 1930s. In
one fell swoop, Stephen Sommers, who revitalized The Mummy in 1999, takes
on Dracula, Frankenstein's Monster, the Wolfman and, believe it or not,
Mr. Hyde as well.
Van Helsing (Hugh Jackman), a leather clad, one-man army, is dispatched
by The Order, a clandestine sect of the Vatican that is supposedly the
last line of defense against evil in the world. According to The Order,
the type of evil they deal with isn't even known by most human beings.
Van Helsing's job is to either capture or kill the monsters of the world.
As
the film begins, we see Count Dracula (Richard Roxburgh) assume control
of Frankenstein's Monster (Shuler Hensley) shortly before the monster
is lost in a windmill fire ala the movies of old. (And, of course, we
know he'll be back later.) Immediately, we're transported ahead one year
to find that Van Helsing has been sent to Transylvania to stop Dracula
before he wipes out the last remaining family of Anna Valerious (Kate
Beckinsale), who have been attempting to destroy him for nine generations.
As soon as Van Helsing and his assistant, a friar named Carl (David Wenham),
arrive, they are attacked by Dracula's brides. Later, after Anna and Van
Helsing decide they're on the same team, we learn that Dracula also employs
the Wolf Man as a henchman. Then we learn that Dr. Frankenstein's life-giving
experiments hold the key to Dracula and his brides giving birth to thousands
of little baby vampires. Shortly after that, I gave up. The plot began
to curl back on itself to the point where I simply didn't care anymore.
I'd been bludgeoned to death by ridiculously over-the-top CGI images and
impossibly stupid dialogue. I was numb. For the first time ever, a summer
blockbuster actually bored me with too much action.
The pacing of the film is all wrong. It opens with a nice black-and-white
homage to the original 1930s films but, almost as soon as the film reverts
to color, it loses any sense of direction that it may have possessed in
an original draft. (And, even then, I'm being optimistic.) Van Helsing is one meaningless action sequence after another that leaves a viewer
completely uninvolved. How many times can a character fall hundreds of
feet only to be saved by a well-placed rope at the last second? It might
work in Spider-Man but, even in that film, it's not over-done. In Van
Helsing, at least four separate individuals fall from impossibly high
places to suddenly swing to a safe landing (or at least to a hard, but
ultimately painless, one).
The
only truly interesting things about Van
Helsing are the creative
touches given to the mostly computer-generated sets or small details,
like the pulsing, luminescent heart of Frankenstein's Monster. It's just
a pity that more attention wasn't paid to the one thing that really needed
it: the script. One can only pray that poor word-of-mouth kills this movie
off as soon as possible or we'll be faced with a Van Helsing II in two
years. Trivia: Originally
planned in 1994 as a direct sequel to Dracula (1992) with Anthony
Hopkins to reprise the title role. After it was pushed back, many
story elements were changed. (Source: The
Internet Movie Database) |